6.1.06
been getting philosophical lately.
see title. wierd stuff jus pop into my head. like how one cannot accuse others of being self-centred without committing the crime himself. i mean this is really tricky. see if you wanted to accuse someone as such cos of smth the person has done to you or not done for you for that matter, wouldnt you be putting urself in a position where u're being self-centred too? so when would your accusation be right? does relativity comes into play? most would agree that it is justified to be self-centred when the other party's self-centredness is so beyond u that ur self-centredness is deemed basic rights. then i would say our 'basic rights' standard would differ. moreover, arent we supposed to be always putting others b4 self, giving sacrificially, etc etc? if so self-centredness is NEVER justified. hmm ok thats settled BUT then what if one feels unhappy cos of the numerous times one has to ignore other's self-centredness?...
whoohoo. looks like i'm just going around in circles. BUT I'M NOT! i'm sure i did achieve my objective of setting u guys thinking! haha. anw i discussed so much about one topic, i dun even hav the mental strength to move on to the other ideas tt had popped into my head.
do tag ur ideas anw. lets hear your views!!
i fluttered by;
4:06 PM
